We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out.

And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.īut you know what? We change lives. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.” My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. “Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My email is Reader,Ībout a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”: Please drop me a line if you know people – students, parents, school staff members, or others – who are taking steps to boost classroom attendance and, in turn, brighten the next generation’s future. Instead, nuanced reasons typically explain troubling trend lines. We’re here to help tell that story and look toward solutions. Most problems in the education realm don’t yield simple answers. Could students’ fragile mental health be causing them to miss school? Or have they simply lost the desire to attend classes? These are questions that educators, researchers, and – yes – even journalists will be exploring as a new school year unfolds. Dee said during a media call earlier this week.That means other factors are at play. Dee says.In two states that have released more recent data, the problem has persisted.“What I found was that the state-level growth in chronic absenteeism was actually unrelated to a measure of COVID infection rates over this period,” Dr. But the rate grew to 28% during the 2021-22 school year. Before the pandemic, in the 2018-19 academic year, about 15% of students missed that much school. states and Washington, D.C., giving a robust national portrait of chronic absenteeism, defined as students missing 10% or more of school days. More than 1 in 4 students were considered chronically absent during the 2021-22 school year, according to data compiled and analyzed by Thomas Dee, an education professor at Stanford University, in partnership with The Associated Press.The analysis examined data from 40 U.S. New teachers, new friends, new knowledge.The fruits of the academic experience, however, rely on students actually being in school. Inevitably, this time of year conjures hopeful feelings of fresh starts and endless opportunities. School bus engines are rumbling, and parents are posting sentimental first-day photos, signaling the start of another academic year.It’s back to class for thousands of children across the United States, with more start dates in the coming weeks.

Fashion faux pas 2013